Yes, but we cannot provide financial support through the main REU funds. You may need to pay for your own travel to Davis and living expenses, and you will not receive the usual REU stipend.

Yes. We cannot guarantee financial support, but we have found non-NSF funds for this purpose in the past and hope to continue to do so.

Yes, if you will enroll in college full-time in the fall. However, only a very rare high school student would be prepared for an REU project. Even college freshmen are rarely accepted to our program.

Note that REUs in related fields can have very different philosophies. For example, many REU sites in mathematics are aimed at students early in their college careers, and might better fit an entering freshman.

Maybe. If your degree was in a field that would not be considered preparation for continued study in physics, then yes. For example, you can apply with a previous degree in English Literature or Psychology, but not with a previous degree in Math or Engineering.

Each mentor looks for different things, so there's no simple answer to that question. Above all, we want good fits between students and their projects. Ideally the project will match the student's preparation, physics interests, and preferences as to how to spend her time. The single most common reason that we rule out a student for some project is lack of sufficient computer skills, although we do also have projects that require little or no computer experience.

To strengthen your application, either try to get some schoolyear research experience (if you're at a school where that's possible), or work on programming either independently or through a class.

If your college does not have research, your lack of experience will not hurt your application. The REU program exists in large part for the sake of students like you. At UC Davis, we make a particular effort to offer projects to promising students from two-year colleges.

At the other extreme, if you are a junior at a major research university we will wonder how interested you can be in research if you haven't yet gotten involved in any. Plenty of students have convincing answers: family, finances, health, recent change of major, etc. Just be sure you explain your situation in your application.

This is a new issue in 2024, and we aren't yet sure of all the details. The warning is correct, in that your answer may appear to be present but is not actually stored in our database. The problem seems to come from certain formatting characters used by Google Docs and possibly other word processing software. Definitely curved apostrophes, quotes, and dashes in Google Docs are a problem. Solutions include: (1) Type your answer directly into the application text box; (2) Cut and paste into the text box, but then delete and retype any apostrophes, quote marks, and dashes; (3) In Google Docs, go to Tools>Preferences>General and uncheck the box for "Use smart quotes." To reformat existing apostrophes type Ctrl-H, type an apostrophe in BOTH the "Find" and "Replace with" fields, and click Replace All; or (4) Use the PDF upload option for the "brief essay on your goals" question, and include all other questions that are giving you trouble in the file. Write the prompts for the questions in the file and put the answer to each question immediately after the corresponding prompt.

We'd be interested in knowing what software you used to compose any problematic answers. If you're willing to help us out on this, send a note to reu@london.ucdavis.edu.

Open the document in whatever word processor or viewer you're using. There may be a "Save As" or "Export" option that allows you to select a format. Alternatively, you could print the document to a file, which will probably be PDF or PostScript (PS) format.

Between the research experience and computer experience fields and your essay, you should be able to cover the important parts of your CV. There is no indication that a formal CV has helped any of our applicants in previous years. However, if you really feel that a CV is crucial to your application, then either upload a file for your essay and include your CV at the end, or upload the CV as an additional transcript.

We know. Please calculate it yourself.

We're aware that some schools don't give letter grades (especially to freshmen) and that others (particularly those abroad) only give grades at the end of the academic year. We will be reasonable about this. Fill in what you can, and make a note about your school's system in the "elaborate on your answers" field at the bottom of the application form. Definitely make sure to let us know what classes you took in the fall and what you're taking in the spring.

No. We request unofficial transcripts for several reasons. First, we don't want students to forgo applying on account of expense. Second, we ask that you upload your transcripts directly to our online system. That saves us the (substantial!) work of scanning and uploading all the transcripts. It also improves readability; occasionally official transcripts are designed not to be scanned and become nearly illegible. Finally, it means the transcript is available sooner and ensures it isn't misfiled with the wrong student's application.

Do not have an official transcript sent to us electronically, since we will not take the time to work through the security surrounding it, save it in a readable format, and upload the result to our database.

If you choose to have an official transcript sent to yourself electronically, make sure you save it as an unlocked file before you upload it. We get several useless locked transcripts each year.

No. We understand that the transcript you upload will be unofficial, and that's fine with us.

No, although if you can do so fairly easily that does make reviewing the application simpler for us. For multiple files, upload a first transcript (preferably the one from your present college). You'll then be prompted for whether you want to upload additional transcripts. You can have as many as you want, and you don't need to upload them all at the same time.

No. If you choose your recommenders correctly, three is more than enough for us to learn what we need. For hints on what makes a good letter, see the next question.

Since this is a physics and astronomy research program, by far the most useful letters are from previous physics or astronomy research mentors. If you did an REU last summer, definitely get a letter! It is just fine to have a letter from someone not at your home institution; some reviewers even view this as a plus. If you also did schoolyear research, get a letter from that too. If you've only done research in another field (math, biology, geology, etc.), you should still get a letter from your mentor. When students have research experience but no corresponding letter of recommendation, we wonder if something went very wrong with the project.

If you've never done research, ask for letters from physics, astronomy, or possibly math professors: people you've taken classes from, graded problem sets for, or talked to for course and career advice. Classes that included some sort of project, rather than strictly problem sets and tests, sometimes let the recommender provide a fresh angle on your work. How well the professor knows you is more important than your grade in the course; we already know your grades from your transcript anyway. It's easy to feel anonymous in classes at big universities, especially during the first two years, but professors are used to writing recommendations for students they don't know very well. Don't be tempted to ask for letters from elementary or high school teachers, your swim coach, your boss from when you worked as a clerk in a department store last summer, or even the graduate student who taught your physics lab. Most grad students have read, let alone written, very few letters of recommendation and don't have a good sense of how to construct a persuasive one.

Also, if you transferred from a community college to a university, get letters from university professors even if they know you less well. University faculty will compare your progress to that of other university students, which is much more useful for us than hearing that you were the strongest student at your two-year college. (In our experience, top community college students can wind up anywhere from in the middle to at the very top of their university classes.) Since we allow three letters, you could get one from your former school and two from your current institution.

Note that these same considerations will be relevant if you apply to physics grad school.

E-mailed letters are uploaded manually to a database, usually on the day they are received or the next business day. We match letters to the correct applications about once a day. Thus most e-mailed letters will register on your status page as submitted by the second business day after they were sent. The matching is done by a script, so mismatches in names (e.g., the recommender enters your name as Kathy but you used Katherine on your application) will prevent matches. We will check manually for such glitches before we start the application review, but definitely let us know if a letter you think we've received isn't registering.

For paper mail the process is the same, except that mail delivery adds about one week to the above estimate.

If a recommendation arrives before the application, it should register as submitted as soon as the application is complete.

Sorry! Our file type recognition isn't perfect. PDF format is the most likely to work. Alternatively, you can e-mail your letter to reu(at)london.ucdavis.edu. It's helpful if you can tell us what operating system and web browser you use, so that we can try to fix the problem for future users.

Contact us and ask whether we'll make you an offer before your other deadline. Usually the answer is no, but sometimes we really are on the verge of a decision. When you call, it occasionally speeds things up a bit (for example, if a mentor was planning to select a student on a Wednesday but finds the time to think it through on Tuesday instead).

Note that any physics REU program that doesn't include an international component should give you until at least March 8 to respond to their offers.

Since each offer is for an individual project, we have to make the offers sequentially. That generally means only one offer per week for each project. If you are, say, the fourth choice for a particular project, you probably won't hear from us until late March (and then only if the three students ahead of you decline).

Unfortunately, no. Contact the other programs and see what they can tell you before our deadline. We use a one-week deadline, as do many other REU programs. It's a balance between the needs of successful applicants who want to compare their different options and the needs of the students who may get offers in the next round. We want to finish the admissions as quickly as possible so that unsuccessful applicants have time to make alternate plans.

There is also the possibility that the system will jam if students aren't given firm deadlines. You might find it amusing to think about how that would work, if you've managed to maintain a sense of humor through this fairly stressful process.

For 2024, Physics REU directors have agreed not to require applicants to respond to offers before Friday March 8. There are a few exceptions, mainly programs with international components that must use earlier deadlines to leave time for passport and visa processing. This means that for most programs you will know before March 8 whether you will have a first-round offer. Again, there are a few exceptions, since programs can make their initial offers later. After March 8, offers will be made as spots are declined, with no timing coordination among different programs.